this bit heavily infers that there was a post inbetween which was later removed, so it should be okay.
PMike- 11-06-2007
Yes. And I think it is fair to presume that anyone that does not rightly presume from this inference that there was a post in between is not worth worrying about the opinion of.
keir- 11-07-2007
Unless they can't read English. But then they wouldn't be able to read the post you were concerned about either.
PMike- 11-14-2007
Indeed, thus there would be no cause for concern.
keir- 11-15-2007
that's about the size of it
PMike- 11-15-2007
The size of chewed testicles or the statement?
keir- 11-21-2007
the situation
PMike- 11-22-2007
Ok. As the first'd be weird
keir- 11-22-2007
why?
PMike- 11-23-2007
Why not?
keir- 11-24-2007
Pol Pot
PMike- 11-26-2007
Hal Hot
keir- 11-29-2007
is he?
PMike- 11-30-2007
I presume so, given the name.
keir- 11-30-2007
the name might be an attempt to compensate for a lack of hotness
Forumer™ is Voted #1 Free Forum Hosting provider
Build your own community today with the largest message board hosting company.